|
Welcome to the Web Hosting Forum - Hosting Reviews, Web Hosting Discussion Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content etc. By registering you have access to many other special features, Like personal blogs, your own personal forum, extended profiles, posting of your resume, free links, photo galleries, auctions etc. We are Web 2.0 Compliant . We also reward our posters and referals with free hosting, domains, prizes etc. Even earn points for reading posts. We offer contests, and events that are sure to please anyone in the hosting industry, web developer or SEO at heart. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|
|||||||
| Samba Samba Labamba workin with this release |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
[Samba] Samba 3 PDC with Vista clients
I searched around and couldn't get a clear answer on a Samba 3 PDC and the
ability to have a Vista "business edition" client: 1. Join the Samba 3 PDC domain for single sign-on. 2. Access Samba 3 PDC controlled shares I read that as of Samba 3.0.21 or so that NTLMv2 works well with Vista computers (which default to only NTLMv2) so they can work with Samba provided shares. This is great and I hope is true. I also read that Vista can be told to allow older Lan Manager protcol versions to talk to older samba setups which is great also -- but I'm thinking I won't need to worry about that as I'm running very recent Samba 3 on my PDC's. What I couldn't determine is if a Vista box could be joined to a Samba 3 controlled domain much the same way I know an XP pro box can be joined w/ the standard "change computer name" dialog in the "system" area of control panel. I realize Samba 3 does not do active directory as a primary domain controller which is fine -- I would like to make sure it's ok for someone planning to buy some windows desktops to go with Vista if they need to (due to XP possibly not being available), but want to be absolutely certain the new boxes can easily be joined to a samba controlled domain. If there's issues, then I will up the priority to get XP pro new boxes so we know they can join the domain. It's my understanding Samba 4 will do active directory as a PDC, but I'm guessing Samba 4 isn't ready for production use / development isn't done. Any info would be appreciated (success stories w/ recent releases of Samba 3 w/ Vista domain members) and I apologize if this has already been answered / discussed on the Samba mailing lists. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "tricking" Vista ultimate upgrade to install on clean HDD? | Ninjak on FW | Windows Vista | 54 | 02-03-2007 01:20 AM |
| Upgrade to Vista | Mark Pearson | Windows Vista | 8 | 02-01-2007 05:43 PM |
| LONG [News Digest] Linux News Digest for the 24hrs preceding 01-02-07 | Mark Kent | Linux Advocacy | 0 | 02-01-2007 02:07 AM |
| LONG [News Digest] Linux News Digest for the 24hrs preceding 30-01-07 | Mark Kent | Linux Advocacy | 0 | 01-31-2007 05:18 AM |
| [NEWS] Windows Vista: What Is the Right Price? | High Plains Thumper | Linux Advocacy | 2 | 01-02-2007 08:45 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.